Post by account_disabled on Dec 27, 2023 20:22:43 GMT -7
AConsequently in relation to art. lit. bb from Law no. with subsequent amendments and additions the provisions of art. of Law no. republished in the form outlined by Law no. for the amendment of art. of the Land Fund Law no. were repealed by the entry into force of art. . of the Civil Code regarding the legal regime of the lands in the townships left at the disposal of the local public administration authorities from persons who have died andor have no heirs. This legal regime aimed at the transfer of these lands into the.
Public ownership of the administrativeterritorial units as well as Country Email List the prohibition of the transfer of the same goods from the public property of the respective administrativeterritorial units into their private property. . The previous finding requires two clarifications First of all the effect shown occurs only with respect to inheritances opened after the entry into force of the Civil Code as expressly provided by art. of Law no. with subsequent amendments and additions. Even if this rule refers to art. para. of the Civil Code the same application in time has without a doubt art. . of the.
Civil Code both rules providing for the transfer of vacant inheritances to the private domain of the administrativeterritorial unit. According to art. para. of the Civil Code A persons inheritance opens at the time of his death which means that the regulation of vacant inheritance from the Civil Code is applicable in the context of deaths occurring after October . For legacies opened prior to this date art. of Law no. republished as amended by Law no. continues to produce its effects by virtue of the tempus regit actum principle given that the newas provided by art. para. of the Civil Code and the Civil.
Public ownership of the administrativeterritorial units as well as Country Email List the prohibition of the transfer of the same goods from the public property of the respective administrativeterritorial units into their private property. . The previous finding requires two clarifications First of all the effect shown occurs only with respect to inheritances opened after the entry into force of the Civil Code as expressly provided by art. of Law no. with subsequent amendments and additions. Even if this rule refers to art. para. of the Civil Code the same application in time has without a doubt art. . of the.
Civil Code both rules providing for the transfer of vacant inheritances to the private domain of the administrativeterritorial unit. According to art. para. of the Civil Code A persons inheritance opens at the time of his death which means that the regulation of vacant inheritance from the Civil Code is applicable in the context of deaths occurring after October . For legacies opened prior to this date art. of Law no. republished as amended by Law no. continues to produce its effects by virtue of the tempus regit actum principle given that the newas provided by art. para. of the Civil Code and the Civil.